Updated: September 23, 2025
The 2025 NFL Draft was a notable event that reverberated across the league, showcasing a plethora of young talent eager to make their mark. This year's draft took place amid substantial buzz, primarily due to the Jacksonville Jaguars' bold move to trade up to the No. 2 spot to select the highly coveted Travis Hunter from Colorado. The anticipation around the draft culminated in what can be characterized as a mix of exciting plays, strategic maneuvers, and intriguing player selections that will shape the upcoming NFL season. Analytical minds like Nate Tice and Charles McDonald from Yahoo Sports provided draft grades for all 32 teams, aiming to assess how well each franchise positioned itself for the future during this crucial offseason.
This article delves deep into the performances of the NFC and AFC divisions, examining how each team approached their draft strategies, which players stood out, and what these selections could mean for their respective futures in the NFL.
NFC East
The NFC East was a battleground characterized by robust selections and strategic improvements. Each team made significant moves aimed at fortifying their rosters, addressing glaring needs, and enhancing overall talent.
Dallas Cowboys: Grade A
The Dallas Cowboys have long been recognized for their emphasis on building an effective offensive line. This year’s draft was no different. With a grade of ‘A,' the Cowboys successfully filled several critical needs. Their first-round selection of Tyler Booker, an offensive guard from Alabama, proved to be a foundational step to strengthen their offensive line. Despite some opinions regarding Booker being a reach, his high-floor potential presents a promising future. Alongside other recruits, such as pass rusher Donovan Ezeiruaku and cornerback Shavon Revel Jr., Dallas aims to boost its rookie contributions significantly.
Notably, the Cowboys’ draft strategy involved addressing areas they seemed to have neglected in prior seasons. The most exciting pick for the Cowboys came in the form of Tyler Booker, a powerful offensive lineman expected to flourish in a talented interior. If he clicks with fellow linemen like Tyler Smith and center Cooper Beebe, Dallas could once again boast one of the most formidable offensive lines in the league.
New York Giants: Grade B
The New York Giants finished their draft with a solid ‘B' grade, reflecting a mixed bag of risks and rewards. Their choice of Jaxson Dart in the first round was perceived as a slight reach, but the team simultaneously managed to snag impactful players throughout the draft. Key selections like Abdul Carter, anticipated to make a splash as a Defensive Rookie of the Year candidate, will add depth and talent to the defensive lineup playing next to established stars like Dexter Lawrence and Brian Burns.
From this draft, the Giants retained invaluable assets, bringing aboard quality players such as Darius Alexander and Cam Skattebo. Particularly significant was their offensive line pick, Marcus Mbow, projected as a long-term solution to bolster a crucial part of their roster. This combination of high-upside players with established talent could lead to a more competitive team.
Philadelphia Eagles: Grade B
The Philadelphia Eagles approached the draft with a unique strategy, earning a ‘B' grade for their efforts. They managed to secure Jihaad Campbell, a linebacker who boasts the versatility to play various roles within the Eagles’ defense. The second-round selection of Andrew Mukuba aimed to shore up the safety position, an area that needed attention. With a youthful and talented defensive back trio forming alongside Quinyon Mitchell and Cooper DeJean, the Eagles are enhancing their defensive prospects significantly.
While their draft wasn’t without its questions, such as the choice to add another linebacker in Smael Mondon Jr., the Eagles focused on keeping the core of their team robust. The acquisition of heavy-hitting, explosive players will undoubtedly keep Philadelphia competitive in the tightly contested NFC East.
Washington Commanders: Grade B+
The Washington Commanders received a solid ‘B+' for their draft performance, characterized by strategic moves that laid the groundwork for future progress. Although they lacked extensive draft capital, the team emerged with promising prospects such as offensive tackle Josh Conerly Jr. and cornerback Trey Amos, both of whom are expected to be long-term fixtures. The bolstering of the offensive line is particularly vital for protecting their young quarterback, providing him with stability and longevity.
Additionally, Conerly's addition should significantly improve the team's offensive line, complementing existing talents and allowing for a more efficient offensive game plan. This strategy reflects a calculated approach to dominate the trenches and create a solid foundation for their future success.
NFC North
Transitioning across the league, the NFC North teams showcased notable improvements as they navigated the draft. Each franchise aimed to balance their immediate needs with long-term aspirations, leading to a range of responses to how successfully they adhered to their strategies.
Chicago Bears: Grade B
The Chicago Bears earned a ‘B' grade for their focused efforts to bolster their offensive roster. Under the underlying theme of improvement, selections like tight end Colston Loveland and wide receiver Luther Burden III signified the team's commitment to enhancing their offensive firepower. Their targeted approach, including picking tackle Ozzy Trapilo, is an indication of their plan to shore up the offensive line, following a dismal offensive performance last season.
While there are still concerns surrounding other selections, particularly in the second round, their overall strategy seems to be encapsulated in a directed effort to improve on a prior lack of depth.
Detroit Lions: Grade B
For the Detroit Lions, the draft acted as a rebuilding phase, earning a ‘B' in the process. The Lions took a pragmatic approach, emphasizing their focus on ‘making do’ with solid trench players and acquiring quality additional assets. With the intention of creating a strong foundation, their selections of linemen throughout the draft signify a proper commitment to enhance their positional strengths.
The most thrilling pick came in the form of Isaac TeSlaa, a developing wide receiver and scouting combine star. Although many questioned his lack of productivity during his collegiate career, this investment indicates a strategic effort to integrate new talents into their offense and explore youth-driven improvement.
Green Bay Packers: Grade B
Receiving a grade of ‘B,’ the Green Bay Packers utilized this draft to refresh their talent pool. Their selection of wide receiver Matthew Golden aimed to fill a noticeable void in their receiving corps, assisting a quarterback who is set to assume a higher responsibility in the coming season. This selection was vital, given Aaron Rodgers' departure and the need for fresh talents to step into significant roles.
Additionally, their choice of Savion Williams appears to usher in a new era of gadget play, signaling an attempt to create mismatches against defenses. This combination of focused selections, particularly along the offensive line with Anthony Belton, should equip the Packers' offense with versatility and drive for a successful season.
Minnesota Vikings: Grade C
The Minnesota Vikings earned a lowly ‘C' grade, indicating some frustration regarding their draft performance. Although their initial pick of Donovan Jackson to enhance the offensive line shows promise, their lack of depth with late selections limited the overall effectiveness of their efforts. As established players like Justin Jefferson aim to pull the weight, the front office must ensure that their efforts bear fruit down the line.
The Vikings’ approach this draft seemed to focus heavily on rebuilding without sacrificing immediate success. This balancing act has yet to prove fruitful as they must develop existing talents and nurture new players for the future.
NFC South
The NFC South proved to be one of the most dynamic divisions during the 2025 NFL Draft. Each team had its unique strategy, driven by varying degrees of urgency, talent evaluation, and the desire to bolster their rosters.
Atlanta Falcons: Grade C-
The Atlanta Falcons, with a ‘C-‘ grade, grappled with some questionable decisions during the draft. Their selection of Jalon Walker and James Pearce Jr., while adding talent to their defensive roster, came at the cost of future assets, raising eyebrows about the return on investment. The decision to trade away a future first-round pick for Pearce could prove detrimental unless they remain competitive during the upcoming season.
Their focus on improving the pass rush through these selections acknowledges the critical need for defensive efficiency, and while they have added notable names, the overall strategy faces skepticism in the long run. Nevertheless, players like Walker should have the opportunity to mold their roles within the larger scheme, depending largely on the coaching staff's vision of them.
Carolina Panthers: Grade A
The Carolina Panthers excelled in the 2025 NFL Draft with an impressive ‘A' grade, reflecting their well-thought-out strategy. Eager to support their young quarterback Bryce Young, the team did not shy away from proactive moves, including the early selection of Tetairoa McMillan, a potential No. 1 wide receiver. Along with promising selections such as Trevor Etienne for added depth in the backfield, the Panthers displayed clear intent on revamping their offensive playmakers.
In focusing heavily on positions that impact game outcomes, Carolina stood out among its peers by acquiring speedsters Nic Scourton and Princely Umanmielen in the second round. These selections show a clear commitment to building offensive prowess, setting them up for both immediate and long-term success.
New Orleans Saints: Grade B-
The New Orleans Saints earned a ‘B-‘ grade in the draft, managing to add solid players while also making questionable choices. Their top pick, Kelvin Banks Jr., presented a significant addition to their offensive line, showcasing versatility that could bolster various blocking schemes. However, the choices made in the later rounds, particularly the pick of Tyler Shough, signal a less enticing approach where risk outweighs reward.
The Saints' strategy revolves around balancing immediate needs and future potential, but the overall consistency in this draft raises questions about prioritization. Their selections for additional depth—Vernon Broughton, Danny Stutsman, and Quincy Riley—did provide solid contributions, yet lacked the upper echelon talent that could transform roster dynamics.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Grade B
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers received a ‘B' for their strategic efforts during the draft. The selection of Emeka Egbuka showcased a push for immediate offensive production, adding a promising field-stretching talent into the mix. With the current landscape of the offensive unit consisting of Chris Godwin and Mike Evans, Egbuka could offer a rival in terms of lineup flexibility and schemes, giving them a renewed intensity on the field.
In addition to bolstering the passing game, the Buccaneers added cornerbacks Benjamin Morrison and Jacob Parrish, hoping to improve their defensive backfield. This blend of offensive and defensive selections demonstrates a calculated approach to maintain balance and competitiveness, particularly with the evolving nature of their division’s offensive capabilities.
NFC West
The NFC West further illustrated the importance of strategic drafting in fortifying rosters that contend for playoff berths. Each franchise prioritized its unique needs while keeping an eye on overarching objectives and player potential.
Arizona Cardinals: Grade A
The Arizona Cardinals approached the 2025 NFL Draft with evident ambition, landing an impressive ‘A' grade. Their strategy centered on fortifying the defense through meticulous selections of high-caliber players, kicking off with Walter Nolen and Will Johnson to build a formidable defensive line. Their awareness in recognizing the need for depth only further underlined an urgency to reinforce their team against savvy opponents.
Among the most exciting picks, Will Johnson’s injury history made him a risk at first glance; however, if he realizes his projected potential, the Cardinals could expect significant dividends. The team displayed clarity in their intentions, reiterating their focus on defensive enhancements while allowing for some flexibility for development opportunities.
Los Angeles Rams: Grade A
The Los Angeles Rams received a resounding ‘A' for their masterful draft strategy and effective execution. Notably, the Rams' transaction of obtaining the Falcons' 2026 first-round pick, while leveraging their own 26th pick, reflects their commitment to long-term planning. The selection of Terrance Ferguson emerged as a testament to their ongoing commitment to enhancing the offensive unit, especially given the positional future of quarterback Matthew Stafford.
Furthermore, the Rams rounded out their draft with solid acquisitions, emphasizing depth on defense with the selection of Josaiah Stewart. The team's strong roster decisions and management of draft capital have positioned them favorably as they navigate a new season, marking a team clearly intent on balancing immediate performance with future sustainability.
San Francisco 49ers: Grade C+
Despite retaining a good reputation, the San Francisco 49ers completed their draft with a lukewarm ‘C+' grade. While they made solid preliminary picks such as Mykel Williams and Alfred Collins, the later selections of Nick Martin and Upton Stout raised concerns regarding their strategic reach. Attempts to add talent at crucial assets must align with player development to ensure that they maintain competitiveness.
The decisions made suggest a degree of risk that might have veered farther than intended, indicating that while bolstering run defense was essential, the 49ers must balance it against immediate offensive needs as well.
Seattle Seahawks: Grade B+
The Seattle Seahawks embraced a forward-thinking strategy during the draft, culminating in a commendable ‘B+' grade for their selection choices. With a renewed focus on athleticism, they prioritized players positioned to maximize on-field impact right away. Drafting Grey Zabel and Nick Emmanwori encapsulated their intent to revitalize the offensive line while targeting exceptional athletes to build around.
Additionally, the selection of Jalen Milroe, touted as a developmental quarterback prospect, highlights the Seahawks' push toward long-term investment in their future. His remarkable traits make him an exciting addition, suggesting that his potential as a game-breaker aligns with the franchise’s goals moving ahead.
AFC East
The AFC East division maneuvered strategically in the draft, focusing on talent acquisition across various positions, coupled with a push to strengthen key areas heading into the new season. The results were varied, resonating with fans and analysts alike.
Buffalo Bills: Grade B-
Entering the draft with a solid reputation, the Buffalo Bills garnered a ‘B-‘ as a reflection of their focus on defensive improvements. Their selection, heavily concentrated on bolstering their defensive unit, manifested in choosing Maxwell Hairston, a cornerback equipped with exceptional speed. While the strategy seems effective, it raises questions about whether there could have been greater emphasis on offensive weapons to provide better support for their more celebrated players.
Despite having top-tier talents, the Bills’ draft choices essentially built depth along their defensive line while still maintaining the structure they rely on. Overall, their ability to identify players with potential contributed positively to their outlook.
Miami Dolphins: Grade B-
The Miami Dolphins also received a ‘B-‘ grade, focusing heavily on fortifying their trenches. Selections of Kenneth Grant and Jonah Savaiinaea were made with the intention to strengthen their offensive line effectively. Grant’s size combined with athleticism enhances an already formidable front, while Savaiinaea serves as a powerful guard fit for their unique style of play. Still, while these choices were beneficial, they lacked decisive offensive firepower.
Moreover, the pick of Ollie Gordon II at running back introduces an interesting dynamic to their playing style, allowing them to shift toward a more physical running approach. Whether this method pays off in terms of yards remains to be seen, but investing in diversification helps provoke fresh perspectives.
New England Patriots: Grade A
The New England Patriots took measured risks during their draft, evidenced by their buoyant ‘A' grade. Seizing opportunities to improve, the Patriots selected Will Campbell as their strong foundational left tackle, effectively allowing for necessary flexibility in their lineup. The addition of running back TreVeyon Henderson, coupled with the selection of Kyle Williams at wide receiver, added significantly to their offensive approach— injectiveness that could spur their success.
The Patriots’ foresight in selecting Jared Wilson positions the team for long-term success at the center position or as a multi-position contributor, showcasing an interest in maximizing depth. The overall diversity and balance achieved through the draft ensured that the team maintains competitiveness for another season.
New York Jets: Grade B+
The New York Jets earned a ‘B+' grade, showcasing an intent on enhancing their offensive line through the selection of Armand Membou. This choice aims to secure the team’s right side, creating a safety net for their quarterback moving forward. Coupled with Mason Taylor’s selection at tight end, who could become an efficient receiver, the Jets are mirroring a strategy of productive talent acquisition.
Equally, the team nabbed several cornerbacks and defensive contributions, indicating a marked focus on bolstering strength across multiple areas. The culmination of their draft activities signals a proper balance of both speed and protection—with an eye toward maintaining competitive stature.
AFC North
The AFC North possessed a rich synergy of competitive franchises looking to reshape their rosters in the draft. Each team’s performance underscored their evaluation process and focus on both immediate results and building for the future.
Baltimore Ravens: Grade B+
The Baltimore Ravens maintained a resilient approach to the draft, resulting in a strong ‘B+' grade. Their move to select Malaki Starks, an adaptable safety, complemented their established core and exhibited a commitment to shoring up the secondary. Meanwhile, Mike Green’s pick added a dynamic presence to the pass rush, which the Ravens rely on to stifle offenses.
This combination demonstrates a multi-faceted approach; the Ravens have designed their draft to allow for creativity on the defensive end, enhancing their pressure on opponents. The overall success hinges on franchise consistency and maintaining healthy competition, which is crucial as they navigate an evolved NFL landscape.
Cincinnati Bengals: Grade C
A stark contrast to their neighbors, the Cincinnati Bengals received a ‘C' grade for their draft outing, which included several head-scratching moves. They opted for Shemar Stewart, whose potential far exceeds the risks involved; however, consistency must be found to validate this strategy. The dual-selection of Demetrius Knight Jr. and Barrett Carter—both solid contributions at the linebacker position—highlights their intentions but necessitates further development.
Faith in young talent is essential for the Bengals, providing both hope and anticipation for immediate contributions. Overall, their draft decisions left many questions regarding overall impact and long-term forward momentum, especially given the intensity of their surrounding competition.
Cleveland Browns: Grade B-
The Cleveland Browns wrapped up their draft dealings with a ‘B-‘ grade, shaped by several impactful moves that raise expectations from their followers. Mason Graham’s selection in the first round stands out, with immediate success anticipated given the franchise’s defensive schemes. Carson Schwesinger’s speedy addition provides an anxious element to the coverage, poised well to disrupt opponents’ strategies.
While they did make shots at quarterback prospects Dillon Gabriel and Shedeur Sanders, the implications of these decisions remain unclear as they highlight a dual approach of leveraging offense and potential risk. The draft overall underscores their commitment to improvement in the context of retooling for the near future.
Pittsburgh Steelers: Grade B
The Pittsburgh Steelers rated themselves favorably with a solid ‘B’ grade, thanks to their insightful selections emphasizing the defensive front. Derrick Harmon’s versatility supports their push for long-term competitiveness. Kaleb Johnson, touted as the “Honey, I shrunk Derrick Henry,” exemplifies their vision for running game enhancement, bringing youthful energy that aligns with their offensive designs.
This effort to solidify their roster through a balanced approach carries significant meaning as they aim for sustainable success, breeding both depth and performance enhancement across vital areas of need.
AFC South
The AFC South emerged from the draft with a myriad of strategies reflective of varied priorities. Teams maneuvered intentionally, ensuring each draft day would contribute to broader organizational goals.
Houston Texans: Grade B
The Houston Texans earned a ‘B' grade from their efforts in the draft as they concentrated on enhancing both their pass-catching and offensive line capabilities. The decision to add Iowa State's duo, Jayden Higgins and Jaylin Noel, suggests a clear emphasis on filling vacancies within their receiving corps. Their push to select Aireontae Ersery as a potential long-term answer at tackle solidifies their strategy to protect their quarterback position effectively.
As a franchise cruising through a rebuilding phase, ensuring that foundational components are established is crucial for success. The development of young talents in the receiver and offensive line positions will ultimately mold the Texans’ future identity.
Indianapolis Colts: Grade B-
Moving toward a ‘B-‘ grade, the Indianapolis Colts strategically targeted impactful selections. Tyler Warren's introduction serves as a fine addition to their tight end room, giving quarterback Anthony Richardson more credible options as they utilize a vertical offensive approach. Jalen Travis adds depth to the offensive line while their selection of Justin Walley aimed to improve cornerback coverage.
The Colts emphasized the importance of skill players in shaping their roster, showcasing a balanced approach between offensive contributors and defensive necessities aimed at creating competitive dynamics in the division. This draft came when they sought to blend immediate impact with foresight for future implications.
Jacksonville Jaguars: Grade A
The Jacksonville Jaguars made a lasting impression with their draft by landing the most talented player in this year’s class, Travis Hunter, through a daring trade to the No. 2 spot. Garnering an ‘A’ grade, the Jaguars showcased an eagerness not just for immediate talent but also for positional versatility on both sides of the ball. Hunter’s expected dual role as a wide receiver and cornerback presents exciting possibilities and strategic depth.
Additionally, the Jaguars endorsed Wyatt Milum to enhance their offensive line while selecting promising defensive talents like Caleb Ransaw. This balanced focus on both sides demonstrates optimism in advancing their competitive stance within the league.
Tennessee Titans: Grade B+
Achieving a ‘B+' rating, the Tennessee Titans conducted a thorough and deliberate draft showcasing smart selections such as Cam Ward, who is seen as the definitive quarterback recruit of this year’s crop. His selection reflects a calculated decision to build around emerging talents while addressing crucial positions needing attention.
Furthermore, they successfully addressed the Edge position with prospects who held the potential for growth, such as Oluwafemi Oladejo. The talent acquired here embodies the Titans’ strategic goal of revamping the squad and seeking out players who fit their football ethos. By inclusively adding pass catchers tailored for Ward, the Titans aim to create a more cohesive offensive identity.
AFC West
In the highly competitive AFC West, teams aimed for strategic excellence amid a landscape populated by powerful contenders. The draft produced varying results as franchises strove to consolidate strength in specific areas.
Denver Broncos: Grade C+
The Denver Broncos received a ‘C+' grade, drawing concerns for their unusual draft decisions. Recognizing the need for depth on their defensive front, they selected Jahdae Barron—his versatility on the field elevates them among their peers. Nevertheless, some choices for offensive prowess, such as choosing RJ Harvey, seemed to slightly miss the mark, signaling a disparity in offensive strategy that might be necessary moving forward.
While the draft successfully supplemented their already-evolving defensive identity, it also evoked discussions on whether the Broncos could effectively develop their offensive unit to support existing stars moving into the competitive landscape.
Kansas City Chiefs: Grade B+
Securing a notable ‘B+' grade, the Kansas City Chiefs exhibited strategic prowess during their draft. The selection of Josh Simmons showcased the efficiency of identifying high-caliber talent and ensuring they bring depth onto their offensive line. With added qualities from pass-rushing talents like Omarr Norman-Lott and Ashton Gillotte, this draft further reflects the Chiefs' consciousness of talent acquisition embedded in their longstanding strategic planning.
Chiefs' colorful selection like Jalen Royals demonstrates a drive toward creating playmakers on offense. The visible aim to maximize vertical talent positions Kansas City positively within the league's competitive dynamics while fostering a progressive offensive identity.
Las Vegas Raiders: Grade B+
The Raiders emerged from the draft process with a favorable ‘B+' grade. Their early investment in blue-chip running back prospect Ashton Jeanty suggests an offense willing to embrace bold measures. As the team aims for transformation, complementary targets like Jack Bech and additional offensive tackles signal a well-rounded effort towards enhancing their roster’s capabilities.
This focus on adding dimensions through strategically crafted talent infusions reveals a brighter future for Las Vegas as they continue weaving together a multifaceted strategy in football operations.
Los Angeles Chargers: Grade C
Closing out their draft with a ‘C' grade, the Los Angeles Chargers capitalized on some intriguing picks but failed to establish a clear direction across their selections. The emphasis placed on selecting Omarion Hampton adds running back strength to their roster; nevertheless, the failure to pursue sufficient assistance for their offensive strategy raises eyebrows.
Wide receiver Tre Harris offers potential but ultimately represents a less decisive choice among other options available that might have better served their existing offensive strategy. Balancing bold selections with needs in key positions will be imperative moving forward if the Chargers are to maintain their competitive prospect.
In summary, the 2025 NFL Draft encapsulated a flurry of activities aimed at reshaping teams across the league. The moves made reflect not only the strategic acumen of franchises but also the aspirations and hopes as they navigate what is consistently acknowledged as an intense and dynamic North American sports landscape. Time will only reveal how successfully these selections will coalesce into coherent unit strategies and enable each team to achieve their desired outcomes in the imminent NFL season.
